Can an Insurer Void a Policy Behind the Victim’s Back? [Sa’Amran 5/11]
Section 96(3) lets an insurer escape a victim’s judgment — but only if it gives notice, and gives it in time. In Appeals No. 2 and No. 3 of Sa’Amran, two insurers skipped that small step. The Federal Court showed them the price.
Read More
Even After Sambung Bayar, Must the Insurer Still Pay the Crash Victim? [Sa’Amran 2/11]
A car sold on a handshake in 2007. A register never told. A crash in 2014. The insurer said the policy died with the sale; the Federal Court read the statute and found the promise still standing exactly where Parliament had left it.
Read More
Can an Insurer Cry Fraud After the Victim Has Won? [Sa’Amran 10/11]
Two contradictory oaths, half the witnesses, the wrong court, and a declaration that came too late. Appeal No. 8 of Sa’Amran is a study in how an insurer loses a fraud case it never properly brought.
Read More
How Tall May a House of Worship Be?
The State of Selangor capped non-Muslim houses of worship at 72 feet. The Constitution has a quiet question to ask: on planning, piety, and the gentle art of measuring devotion in feet
Read More
Can a Malaysian court make a Doorstep Delivery Order? If so, upon what conditions?
Yes, Malaysian courts can compel delivery at your doorstep — but should the gentler name earn a gentler test?
Read More
Was the dissolution of the NS State Assembly lawful—and what now? [6/NS]
Was the dissolution lawful, and how far may a court go? The architecture of royal non-justiciability, explained neutrally.
Read More