How Do You Turn Two Hours of Rambling Argument Into Forty Minutes of Justice? The Judging Genius of Edgar Joseph Jr
A two-hour submission, one raised hand, and forty minutes: how a Federal Court judge quietly rewrote Malaysian law.
Read MoreA two-hour submission, one raised hand, and forty minutes: how a Federal Court judge quietly rewrote Malaysian law.
Read MoreA judge reproduced a lawyer’s submissions almost word for word. Two Commonwealth traditions have quietly answered why that matters.
Read MoreGet some facts wrong, and the law may still shield you. Here is every defence a journalist has.
Read MoreCompulsory motor insurance has a quiet exception — and injured employees often fall through it. Should we change the law?
Read MoreWho says that a third party victim of an accident, "cannot claim for property damage"? Would the Constitution treat personal injury as different from damage to a victim's property just because a statute ignores constitutional rights?
Read MoreThe State of Selangor capped non-Muslim houses of worship at 72 feet. The Constitution has a quiet question to ask: on planning, piety, and the gentle art of measuring devotion in feet
Read MoreWas the dissolution lawful, and how far may a court go? The architecture of royal non-justiciability, explained neutrally.
Read MoreCan a 1982 ouster clause still keep the courts out? Eighty years of common-law authority, laid before the bench.
Read MoreA constitutional storm turning on a headcount: was Mubarak still an Undang when the four chiefs acted?
Read MoreWho may lawfully remove Negeri Sembilan’s ruler — the grounds, the enquiry, and the signature the chiefs cannot skip.
Read More