A wife forged her husband's signature. The farm passed to strangers. The Privy Council let them keep it — and half the Torrens world still would.
Read More
One dreadful word on a front page. One careful court. How “allegedly” failed to save a newspaper.
Read More
He touched his client money once; the law’s answer reveals what the profession fears most.
Read More
(Or the Newcastle Vanishing Act). On 5 March 2026, Westminster passed a statute that quietly told 850 medical students in Johor their Newcastle degrees no longer counted in Britain. Why? Geography. If you have a child, a brother, or a wallet on the line, read on.
Read More
It’s no longer if—but when—your next court ruling will be shaped by AI. Judges worldwide already lean on algorithms to sift through files, assess risks, and even draft early versions of judgments. This piece explores how deeply AI has entered courtrooms, where it can do the heavy lifting for overloaded court systems—but also why human judgment must stay at the heart of justice.
Read More
A royal pardon is not always what it seems. Nor are all pardons born equal. This essay sets Anwar’s legal clean slate against Najib’s trimmed sentence, and asks what that reveals about power, process, and the Malaysian Constitution. Along the way, it shows how two decisions of the Pardons Board produced strikingly different outcomes in law, politics, and public meaning – a tale of delays, denials, and enduring debates.
Read More
When a professional is found guilty of multiple misconducts, should a disciplinary body impose separate punishments for each offence, and then add them up, or just impose a single punishment for all? What if the offences occurred during the same incident, or at different times? How should the appropriate punishment be decided?
Read More
A doctor's split-second decision saves one life; but costs another. When does error of judgement become medical negligence? The answer will reshape healthcare itself. And the courts are struggling with it.
Read More
Every courtroom dispute hinges on a deceptively simple question: "What exactly are we arguing about?" Yet this fundamental inquiry—whether we are debating what the law says, what actually happened, or how proven facts fit legal standards—can determine the fate of both victims and defendants. The distinction isn't merely academic; it shapes everything from appeal strategies to awards for compensation.
Read More
The Asian International Arbitration Centre is the leading edge in Asian and Malaysian International arbitration.
Read More