Was the dissolution of the NS State Assembly lawful—and what now? [6/NS]
Was the dissolution lawful, and how far may a court go? The architecture of royal non-justiciability, explained neutrally.
Read MoreWas the dissolution lawful, and how far may a court go? The architecture of royal non-justiciability, explained neutrally.
Read MoreCan a 1982 ouster clause still keep the courts out? Eighty years of common-law authority, laid before the bench.
Read MoreA constitutional storm turning on a headcount: was Mubarak still an Undang when the four chiefs acted?
Read MoreWho may lawfully remove Negeri Sembilan’s ruler — the grounds, the enquiry, and the signature the chiefs cannot skip.
Read MoreHow the 1959 constitution actually works: the composite Ruler, the four electors, and the clause built to silence courts.
Read MoreNegeri Sembilan is Malaysia’s only state that elects its ruler. Here is the six-century machine behind the throne.
Read MoreMalaysia has the laws to stop tariff-dodging — but one crucial piece is missing.
Read MoreYour car is clamped. RM100 is demanded for its release. You pay, in anger. Can they do it? Can you sue the car-park owner? How?
Read MoreFor decades, one person in Putrajaya has worn two hats. He advises the government on how to stay in power. He decides who will be prosecuted and who will quietly walk away. Does the new “AG–PP split” Bill truly cut that cord, or simply dresses old political control in the language of 'reform'? Do you know what I think?
Read MoreThe Anwar government is changing who controls the gate into the legal profession. A Minister will choose - and can remove - most of the people who decide who becomes a lawyer. When politicians control that gate, future lawyers may think twice before taking cases against the government. And when that happens, ordinary Malaysians may struggle to find truly independent help in court.
Read More