What is the difference between ‘Questions of Law’, ‘Questions of Fact’ and ‘Mixed’ questions?

7–10 minutes to read

Every courtroom dispute hinges on a deceptively simple question: "What exactly are we arguing about?" Yet this fundamental inquiry—whether we are debating what the law says, what actually happened, or how proven facts fit legal standards—can ...

Read More

Can a court change the language of a written constitution?

7–10 minutes to read

No: only Parliament wields the power to amend the Constitution:(Article 159). Yet deeper currents flow beneath: MA63 protects East Malaysian rights. Any constitutional amendment requires their consent. And it is an international Treaty lodged with ...

Read More

Filtering Appeals: How could the Court of Appeal improve section 68 CJA Leave Applications?

2 minutes to read

Step into the Court of Appeal on a busy day. Fifteen or more leave applications, each one dragging on—an hour gone with every hearing. Judges listen, counsel argue, yet somehow the essentials get lost in ...

Read More

Justice on trial: Can Malaysians still trust their courts?

7–10 minutes to read

Is Malaysia still a land where everyone stands equal before the law? Or have powerful hands quietly reshaped our justice system to favour the few?

Read More

Who guards the Guardians? What happens when the PM has the power to pick judges, but is in conflict?

9–13 minutes to read

The PM, the CJ, and other constitutional appointees are all guardians of the Constitution. If one falters, what happens? When a Prime Minister faces a suit in court, yet it is he who must pick ...

Read More

CJ’s Malta speech defines Democracy: a Government’s legitimacy depends on an Independent Judiciary

8–11 minutes to read

Can a judge speak truth about justice without facing negative consequences? Chief Justice Tengku Maimun’s Malta Speech exposed the deepest fractures. It revealed a constitutional cross-road by asking this question: "Will Malaysians choose constitutional rule, ...

Read More