The NS Constitution and the clause built to silence the courts: can it? [5/NS]
Can a 1982 ouster clause still keep the courts out? Eighty years of common-law authority, laid before the bench.
Read MoreCan a 1982 ouster clause still keep the courts out? Eighty years of common-law authority, laid before the bench.
Read MoreA constitutional storm turning on a headcount: was Mubarak still an Undang when the four chiefs acted?
Read MoreWho may lawfully remove Negeri Sembilan’s ruler — the grounds, the enquiry, and the signature the chiefs cannot skip.
Read MoreHow the 1959 constitution actually works: the composite Ruler, the four electors, and the clause built to silence courts.
Read MoreNegeri Sembilan is Malaysia’s only state that elects its ruler. Here is the six-century machine behind the throne.
Read MoreUnendorsed by the highest court, the 'commonality' doctrine's crumbling bones still haunt Malaysian roads. Should they not be buried altogether?
Read MoreMalaysia has the laws to stop tariff-dodging — but one crucial piece is missing.
Read MoreYou are arguing a case. The court asks you to share a document. You try. Everything stalls. The screens freeze. The judges tap their fingers impatiently. Is there a faster, foolproof way to share PDFs over Zoom at hearings? Yes, there is.
Read MoreWhat if the people you trust with your property quietly sell it—and then insist the contract lets them? In a Singapore case about 14 vintage cars, the court reached for a centuries‑old “ghost” of English law called bailment. Can that ghost still decide modern disputes? If you ever leave anything in someone else’s hands, you should read this essay
Read MoreYour car is clamped. RM100 is demanded for its release. You pay, in anger. Can they do it? Can you sue the car-park owner? How?
Read More