The Constitution of Negeri Sembilan never says its Ruler may be ‘removed’. What it says instead is stranger, and exact.
Read More
Every federation keeps an axe behind glass. Malaysia has broken that glass twice, over a State quarrel. What exactly is behind it now?
Read More
A proclamation, its own lawyers said, was unconstitutional. The Executive Council voted anyway — and left civil servants not knowing who to obey.
Read More
Its own lawyer called the plan unconstitutional. That lawyer may also be a federal officer — which changes what “the state’s own view” even means.
Read More
If a Ruler was never lawfully Ruler, what happens to every appointment, every order, every law made under him? Two rules answer. They disagree.
Read More
In 2010 the Federal Court let a Menteri Besar fall without a single vote being taken. One clause did it. Does Negeri Sembilan have that clause?
Read More
A paper dated April. A signature added in August, by a man who was not a Menteri Besar in April. Can a constitution be finished in two halves?
Read More
Fourteen words went out. Three went in. What the courts had held by right, they now held by permission. Parliament gives. Parliament may take away. ... The heading is still there. Underneath it, there is none.
Read More
He declared Malaysia's law secular, then spent the rest of his life obeying his own judgment — in pencil. Why the pencil, do you think?
Read More
How the 1959 constitution actually works: the composite Ruler, the four electors, and the clause built to silence courts.
Read More