A Judiciary that Talks Back [Part 3/11-The Malaysian Judiciary Then and Now]
The head of the judiciary spent 1987 publicly refusing to criticise the Government. He was removed in 1988 for talking too much.
Read MoreThe head of the judiciary spent 1987 publicly refusing to criticise the Government. He was removed in 1988 for talking too much.
Read MoreThirty branches. Nobody had registered them. That was enough to kill the party that had governed Malaysia since independence. Not a coup. Not a scandal. Thirty forms nobody had filed.
Read MoreA Prime Minister complained, on the record, of a judiciary that would not do as it was told. Two years of investigation later, the government's own panel could find exactly one ruling to support the complaint — and it favoured a foreigner, not a political enemy. A Lord President lost his career inside that gap.
Read MoreThirty ringgit turns five mortal trustees into a body corporate that never dies — and escapes the Companies Act entirely.
Read MoreThe title names five men. It does not name the trust. And the five are mortal.
Read MoreThe company may not hold the land. So let it not hold the land. Four hundred years ago the law worked out how.
Read MoreA man wants to give land to the temple he has worshipped at for forty years. One sentence stops him.
Read MoreA bank searched the title, gave a loan against what it saw, and lost the lot. There was no forger anywhere in this story.
Read MoreMalaysia gives the true owner his land back. The duped buyer gets nothing — until the Land Registry was made to pay.
Read MoreOne judgment was ninety-four per cent copy-paste. How the keyboard killed judicial thought — and how to revive it.
Read More