He crippled his wife, then nursed her for years — now his insurer calls that kindness a reason not to pay.
Read More
Was the dissolution lawful, and how far may a court go? The architecture of royal non-justiciability, explained neutrally.
Read More
Can a 1982 ouster clause still keep the courts out? Eighty years of common-law authority, laid before the bench.
Read More
A constitutional storm turning on a headcount: was Mubarak still an Undang when the four chiefs acted?
Read More
Who may lawfully remove Negeri Sembilan’s ruler — the grounds, the enquiry, and the signature the chiefs cannot skip.
Read More
How the 1959 constitution actually works: the composite Ruler, the four electors, and the clause built to silence courts.
Read More
Negeri Sembilan is Malaysia’s only state that elects its ruler. Here is the six-century machine behind the throne.
Read More
What if the people you trust with your property quietly sell it—and then insist the contract lets them? In a Singapore case about 14 vintage cars, the court reached for a centuries‑old “ghost” of English law called bailment. Can that ghost still decide modern disputes? If you ever leave anything in someone else’s hands, you should read this essay
Read More
Your car is clamped. RM100 is demanded for its release. You pay, in anger. Can they do it? Can you sue the car-park owner? How?
Read More
A royal pardon is not always what it seems. Nor are all pardons born equal. This essay sets Anwar’s legal clean slate against Najib’s trimmed sentence, and asks what that reveals about power, process, and the Malaysian Constitution. Along the way, it shows how two decisions of the Pardons Board produced strikingly different outcomes in law, politics, and public meaning – a tale of delays, denials, and enduring debates.
Read More