Does compulsory motor insurance protect every accident victim? [Part-1/2: Employee exception]
Compulsory motor insurance has a quiet exception — and injured employees often fall through it. Should we change the law?
Read MoreCompulsory motor insurance has a quiet exception — and injured employees often fall through it. Should we change the law?
Read MoreTwo friends bin a beer and a coffee together. So why must Selangor's rubbish now declare its faith?
Read MoreDuring pupillage, she may rise and argue before a magistrate. The moment pupillage ends, her voice falls silent — until Call. This is where the two lines fall, and why.
Read MoreShe cannot drive. She did not buy the tyres. Yet an insurer says she should pay her father's ninety per cent. The law, and four jurisdictions, say otherwise.
Read MoreA three-year-old survives a fatal crash. Four doctrines collide. Some lawyers might confuse them. Here is how not to.
Read MoreAre we asking the right questions about legal training? Malaysia wants to retire the CLP — but the exam, and the training, were never the real danger. It is what we fail to teach.
Read MoreWho says that a third party victim of an accident, "cannot claim for property damage"? Would the Constitution treat personal injury as different from damage to a victim's property just because a statute ignores constitutional rights?
Read MoreHe touched his client money once; the law’s answer reveals what the profession fears most.
Read MoreThe insurer says the device is unregistered, so it need not pay. The law replies: notwithstanding any written law, it must.
Read MoreA brachial plexus injury costs an arm — and the law makes the insurer pay.
Read More