Your solicitor raided your money for his own emergency, then quietly put it back. The courts said the wrong was done the moment he took it. Suppose A donates a kidney meant for B, the patient waiting on the transplant list. The surgeon instead implants it in his girlfriend. How would you feel about it — especially if you were B?
Read More
Every year the judges and lawyers of Malaysia played the lawyers of Singapore at games... In 1988 it was cancelled. ... Men can play cricket together again while the thing they serve is still broken.
Read More
The Bar went to court twice for the judges, and lost twice. The second time, it was the Bar that was punished.
Read More
Fourteen words went out. Three went in. What the courts had held by right, they now held by permission. Parliament gives. Parliament may take away. ... The heading is still there. Underneath it, there is none.
Read More
Three of them apologised. Two refused. That is how the story is usually told. It is wrong in every part.
Read More
Six men were appointed to try the head of the Malaysian judiciary. One of them would get his job.
Read More
The letter that brought down the Malaysian judiciary asked for nothing. It made no demand. It threatened nobody. It sought no remedy from any court. It expressed disappointment, and it expressed a hope. It was also not the Lord President's idea.
Read More
The head of the judiciary spent 1987 publicly refusing to criticise the Government. He was removed in 1988 for talking too much.
Read More
A Prime Minister complained, on the record, of a judiciary that would not do as it was told. Two years of investigation later, the government's own panel could find exactly one ruling to support the complaint — and it favoured a foreigner, not a political enemy. A Lord President lost his career inside that gap.
Read More
A businessman pays RM10 million and 26 charges vanish. When should the State take the money, and when should it explain itself?
Read More